Roy Keane Criticizes James Maddison’s Tottenham Impact and Questions Midfielder’s Readiness Amid Injury Concerns

Alright, I need to shorten this article to around 650 words and add some pictures. Let me start by reading through the original content to understand the key points.

First, the main points are:
– Roy Keane criticized James Maddison despite his injury.
– Maddison has been out for two weeks with a calf strain.
– Keane questions if Maddison can make a significant impact upon return.
– Mentions Spurs’ poor league position and injury crisis.
– Stats on Maddison’s performance (8 goals, 4 assists) and his standout game against Man City.
– Upcoming match against Man United is crucial.

Now, I need to condense these points. Focus on Keane’s critique, Maddison’s injury, stats, and the context of Spurs’ season. Remove repetitive statements and less important details like the details about CSS and site tracking codes in the original HTML. Also, the original has a lot of HTML elements that aren’t needed in the rewritten version; they can be ignored.

For pictures, the original has images of Keane, Maddison, and Postecoglou. I should note where to place these images in the shortened version. Maybe after the first mention of Keane’s comments, then Maddison’s injury, and then Postecoglou’s challenges.

Check word count as I go. The original text (after stripping HTML) is about 650 words, but the user wants it shortened. Wait, actually, the original is longer once processed. Let me verify.

Original text actually, looking at the body, the paragraphs are:

– Introduction of Keane’s criticism
– Spurs’ league position
– Maddison’s absence
– Keane’s quotes criticizing Maddison’s inconsistency
– Maddison’s stats
– Injury crisis at Spurs
– Transfers in January
– Upcoming match vs Man Utd

So likely around 500-600 words. Wait, the user wants to shorten to around 650 words. The original content is from a Daily Mail article, which tends to be verbose. Let me count the actual words.

Original text (main body) word count is maybe around 500 words. The user says “shorten this content to about 650 words” – perhaps the original is longer. Hmm, maybe due to HTML clutter. Oh, in the original, there’s a lot of HTML, ads, tracking codes, etc. So the actual content is shorter, but with HTML it’s longer. The user wants the content without HTML shortened to 650 words. So need to extract the text, then rewrite it concisely.

Wait, let me check. Original text in the body is:

Paragraphs starting with Roy Keane has questioned…, Ange Postecoglou’s side…, Maddison is among…, Keane said…, He got relegated…, In the league…, His most impressive…, Keane continued…, In his last outing…, Much of Tottenham’s…, For their recent defeat…, As a result…, Tottenham’s next…, Roy Keane was speaking…

So maybe around 400 words. So to get to 650, adding some details but making it concise. But perhaps the HTML version is longer. Wait, the user might have a confusion. Alternatively, maybe the user means a rewritten version of the HTML content but in text, shortened to 650 words and adding some pictures. Hmm.

Wait, the user provided HTML code with an article, and wants it rewritten into a shortened version (around 650 words) with some pictures added. So, the task is to take the article from the HTML, extract the text, shorten it to 650 words, and suggest where images (from the original, like the ones of Keane, Maddison, etc.) should be placed.

Looking at the original HTML, there are multiple images already, which are:

1. Image: Roy Keane has questioned when James Maddison (pictured) will ‘step up’ for Tottenham
2. Image: Former Man United captain Keane questioned when Maddison will ‘step up’ for Tottenham
3. Image: Maddison has had impressive spells for Spurs but, ultimately, has lacked consistency
4. Image: Maddison is among a number of current absentees for Tottenham boss Ange Postecoglou

In the rewritten version, perhaps include 2-3 of these images, placing them at relevant points. The user might want image placeholders with captions.

Also, the original includes things like “LISTEN NOW…” link and author info, which can be omitted or condensed.

The user might want a more concise article focusing on Keane’s criticism, Maddison’s injury, impact on Spurs, stats, and conclusion with the upcoming match.

So, the structure should be:

– Title
– Introduction: Keane’s criticism of Maddison
– Context: Spurs’ poor season, injuries