
Scientists Reveal Alien-Engraved Spherical UFO Discoveries Confirming Extraterrestrial Origin
Mysterious ‘Buga Sphere’ Sparks UFO Debate: Evidence and Skepticism Collide
A puzzling metallic sphere recovered in Colombia has ignited a fierce debate among experts, with some claiming it could be genuine extraterrestrial technology. Dubbed the “Buga sphere,” the object’s eerie properties—including fiber-optic-like wiring, sudden weight fluctuations, and a bizarre ability to dehydrate its surroundings—have left scientists both intrigued and divided.
The Discovery
On March 2, the sphere was filmed zigzagging over Buga, Colombia, before crashing into a power line and landing in a field. Witnesses described it as defying conventional aircraft motion. Local resident David Velez el Potro and his friend Jose retrieved the object, initially noting it weighed just 4 pounds and felt “cold as a refrigerator.” However, since its recovery, the sphere’s weight mysteriously ballooned to 22 pounds without changing size—a phenomenon some scientists argue hints at gravity-manipulating technology.
[Image: The Buga sphere, a metallic orb with a smooth surface, resting in a dried-out grassy field.]
Scientific Analysis
Researchers from Mexico’s National Autonomous University (UNAM) conducted microscopic scans, revealing a labyrinth of fiber-optic cables and 18 microspheres surrounding a central “chip.” Engineer Rodolfo Garrido, part of the UNAM team, proposed the sphere might use an electromagnetic field for propulsion, which destabilized after striking the power line. “It’s designed to levitate by manipulating gravitational forces,” he claimed during a controversial TV interview with UFO enthusiast Jaime Maussan.
The sphere’s impact site added to the mystery: the once-lush field withered completely, with grass and soil脱水脱水脱水脱水 (dehydrated)—potentially due to anion particles draining moisture, per UNAM hypotheses. Experts also detected a decaying ionized field around the object.
[Image: Close-up of microscopic scans showing intricate fiber-optic wiring inside the sphere.]
Skepticism and Controversy
Despite these findings, critics urge caution. Dr. Julia Mossbridge, a cognitive neuroscientist, dismissed the sphere as a “man-made art project,” stressing no proven link between the recovered object and the UFO videos. Skepticism deepened due to Maussan’s involvement; he has a history of promoting debunked UFO claims, including infamous “alien mummy” hoaxes in Peru.
[Image: Jaime Maussan holding a microphone at a press conference, with the sphere displayed nearby.]
Health Effects and Environmental Impact
Velez and Jose reported nausea and vertigo after handling the sphere, while nearby residents confirmed the crash site remains barren months later. “The grass hasn’t regrown—it’s as if the sphere emitted energy that killed the land,” Velez noted. Garrido speculated invisible radiation or static discharge caused the damage, though UNAM ruled out conventional radiation sources.
[Image: Side-by-side images of the lush field before the crash and the parched, dead patch afterward.]
The Weight Mystery
One of the most baffling traits is the sphere’s fluctuating weight. Garrido revealed it gradually increased to 22 pounds post-crash, suggesting it “releases energy to lighten itself for flight.” Such claims align with theories of advanced propulsion systems, though Mossbridge countered that no peer-reviewed studies confirm these observations.
Conclusion: A Human Hoax or Alien Tech?
While UNAM plans reverse-engineering efforts, Mossbridge emphasized the burden of proof lies with UFO proponents. “Extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence,” she stated, acknowledging humanity’s growing openness to extraterrestrial possibilities. As debates rage, the Buga sphere remains an enigma—a intersection of hope for alien contact and caution against sensationalism.
[Image: Scientists in lab coats examining the sphere under bright lights, with tools scattered on a table.]
Whether the sphere is a groundbreaking discovery or an elaborate hoax, it underscores our fascination with the unknown—and the challenges of separating science from speculation.