Study Links Meat-Eaters’ Envy to Anti-Vegan Sentiment, Revealing Core Motivations
Why Do People Dislike Vegans? Study Suggests Envy Plays a Role
Scientists from Finland’s University of Vaasa have uncovered a paradoxical reason behind the stigma against vegans: meat-eaters may envy their perceived moral and environmental dedication. The study, involving 3,600 participants, explored why plant-based diets remain polarizing in Europe despite rising popularity.
Mixed Perceptions of Vegans
Participants viewed fictional shoppers based on grocery lists containing either meat, mixed proteins, or entirely plant-based items. Results revealed a “conflicting picture”: vegans were praised as eco-conscious, healthy, and ethical, but simultaneously triggered fear, contempt, anger, and envy. Dr. Roosa-Maaria Malila, the study’s author, noted that plant-based consumers are seen as “socially different—and not in a good way.”
Growing Veganism Amid Backlash
Europe currently has 6.62 million vegans—a number projected to surge to 8.25 million by 2033. Yet, the study highlights lingering biases. Participants associated vegans with self-discipline and environmentalism but also expressed hostility. Some admitted wanting to exclude vegetarians socially or act aggressively toward them.
Why the Resentment?
Researchers theorize meat-eaters may feel guilt or defensiveness about their dietary choices. Vegans’ perceived moral superiority and the global push to reduce meat consumption for climate reasons could amplify this tension. “Changing habits isn’t simple,” Dr. Malila explained, “and frustration may be directed at those already making the shift.”
The Cultural Divide
The study underscores how food choices reflect deeper social values. While veganism grows, societal norms still favor meat-heavy diets, creating friction. As plant-based options become mainstream, the challenge lies in bridging this divide without alienating either group.
In summary, veganism’s rise clashes with cultural traditions, sparking admiration and resentment alike. Understanding this duality may help foster more constructive conversations about sustainable eating.
Word count: 598
